Controversial Paraglider Approval by Israel and the EU Prior to the Attack
Three months before the war, the EU decided to transform Gaza's beaches into paragliding spots. Despite previous security concerns, Israel unexpectedly approved the introduction of paraglides into Gaza.
This decision played a critical role in the terrorists' successful infiltration. Using paraglides, they flew over the fence into the Gaza Envelope settlements, disabling the "Shooter Seer" system designed to prevent such attacks.
ZAKA’s Founder Cryptic Message + Body Fridges Instalments
Despite intelligence agencies typically knowing about minor attacks, Israel's largest terrorist attack went undetected.
Yehuda Meshi Zahav, founder and chairman of ZAKA revealed their coordination with Hamas for every small attack.
Shockingly, reports indicate numerous body refrigerators were installed two weeks before the massacre.
ZAKA (Hebrew: זק"א, abbreviation for Zihuy Korbanot Ason, זיהוי קרבנות אסון, lit. 'Disaster Victim Identification') is a series of voluntary community emergency response teams in Israel.
A Failure to Inform - The Night of the Terrible Massacre
On the night before the massacre, IDF and Shin Bet heads held an emergency meeting. They concluded that a battle, possibly including civilian kidnappings, was likely on Saturday. Shockingly, they chose not to inform anyone.
Channel 12 News revealed that clear signs of imminent action were discussed, yet no alerts were raised, and no reinforcements were sent. Soldiers were left unaware, resulting in devastating consequences.
Israeli Air Force Failed to Intervene During the Massacre
On October 7th, field evidence reveals a troubling lack of helicopter intervention during the Hamas attack. Although helicopters were spotted over several communities, they did not engage. In most affected areas, helicopters were absent until the afternoon or even the next morning.
Members of Kibbutz Magen's standby squad reported seeing helicopters flying overhead while they were in prolonged combat with terrorists. Incredibly, the helicopters did not assist. A combat helicopter could have decimated the terrorists from above, but no action was taken. Despite a helicopter base being only a minute and a half away, neither helicopters nor planes arrived.
Army chiefs halted the Air Force, which was on standby and ready to act. An IDF Air Force pilot confirmed on Channel 13 that the Air Force was on routine alert that Saturday but did not intervene. When questioned about why the Air Force did not stop the massacre or deploy Apache helicopters, the pilot responded, "I cannot discuss this topic at this time."
This failure to act raises significant questions about the decisions made by army chiefs and the lack of aerial intervention during the critical hours of the attack.
Testimonies and Evidence of Orders to Withhold Assistance
Multiple testimonies and pieces of evidence indicate that the IDF was ordered to withhold assistance during the Hamas attack, resulting in severe delays and inadequate medical attention for many.
Delayed Response: Citizens and standby units reported IDF response times ranging from 7 to 12 hours, and in some cases even longer. Rabbi Hanania Weissman from the Tzuchar community testified that the IDF first arrived 27 hours after the attack began. Even after initial contact, the army indicated they might not reach the community until the next morning.
Explicit Instructions: Rabbi Hanania Weissman testified that the IDF had explicit orders not to respond for seven hours. A video featuring the chairman of a charity organization, with testimony from Weissman, claims confidential sources informed him the IDF was instructed to stay away from the disaster zone for at least seven hours, allowing Hamas to operate without interference.
Standby Units Left Unsupported: In Beeri, standby unit members saw about 500 well-armed soldiers standing outside while terrorists attacked residents inside. Despite urgent pleas for intervention, the soldiers remained inactive. One survivor even communicated directly with the Prime Minister, who assured him the situation was being addressed, yet no action was taken for hours.
Premeditated Withdrawals: Channel 13 reported that soldiers from the Golani Brigade, patrolling the fence line, were ordered to leave the area half an hour before the Hamas attack. They were directed to evacuate the exact route through which Hamas later infiltrated. Had the Golani fighters remained, they could have intercepted the terrorists.
This account of delayed military response, explicit orders to withhold assistance, and unexplained withdrawals suggests a troubling narrative of the events surrounding the attack, raising serious questions about potential premeditation and coordination.
IDF's Delayed Response During Hamas Attack
In an interview with Channel 13, the military regular security coordinator of the Shlomit community recounted his experience on the day of the Hamas attack. When he contacted the IDF for assistance, he received a text message with a sad emoji in response.
Despite numerous breaches in the fence, not a single point was shelled or blocked. Terrorists launched a second wave of attacks, taking more prisoners and killing more civilians, yet no military aid arrived. It appeared as if someone had instructed the IDF to withhold intervention until the late afternoon.
Deleted Evidence - The Missing Videos from October 7
In a recent article by Walla News, a senior reserve officer revealed a troubling incident related to the investigation of the October 7 attack. The officer recounted sitting with a general to review a video of one of the events, only to discover that the videos had been deleted.
"It was very embarrassing," the officer said. "Then suspicion arose, and finally, the excuses started. We were told that special privileges had been granted to those who requested. But rank officers like us need permissions? It seems like a war of generals and military roles. It feels like everyone is now trying to take care of themselves after the attack."
This revelation raises serious concerns about transparency and accountability within the military, suggesting a possible cover-up and internal conflict following the attack.
The Guardian: Hamas Used Spies Inside Israeli Military Bases
In a recent article by Walla News, a senior reserve officer revealed a troubling incident related to the investigation of the October 7 attack. The officer recounted sitting with a general to review a video of one of the events, only to discover that the videos had been deleted.
"It was very embarrassing," the officer said. "Then suspicion arose, and finally, the excuses started. We were told that special privileges had been granted to those who requested. But rank officers like us need permissions? It seems like a war of generals and military roles. It feels like everyone is now trying to take care of themselves after the attack."
This revelation raises serious concerns about transparency and accountability within the military, suggesting a possible cover-up and internal conflict following the attack.
Terrorists' Complacency Revealed: They Knew No One Would Intervene
Survivors' testimonies from that fateful Saturday paint a disturbing picture: the terrorists were remarkably calm and unhurried. Unlike the typical behavior of skilled Hamas operatives, who are trained to act swiftly due to the expected rapid response of the IDF, these terrorists lingered. They entered homes, cooked food, and sat down to eat on the lawns, showing no fear of immediate retaliation.
The terrorists' leisurely behavior suggests they were confident they had ample time to carry out their brutal activities. They knew they had a significant time window to organize, kill, loot, and rob without facing immediate intervention. This raises troubling questions: who leaked this information to them? How were they able to execute their plan until the evening without any hindrance?
System Failure: The Disabling of the 'See Shoot' Defence Mechanism
Retired police superintendent Avi Weiss revealed troubling details about the failure of the "See Shoot" system, designed to safeguard Israeli borders. This sophisticated defense mechanism, capable of remote activation, is intended to deter and incapacitate intruders attempting to breach the fence. However, on the day of the attack, the system was inexplicably offline.
Superintendent Weiss clarified that the system was not malfunctioning but deliberately deactivated under orders from higher-ranking officials. This deliberate neutralization rendered the entire defense system inoperative, enabling Hamas terrorists to infiltrate Israeli territory unimpeded. With the "See Shoot" system offline, Hamas operatives exploited drones to breach the fence and disable border cameras, further compromising security.
Grounded Guardians: The Failure of Observation Balloons Before the Attack
In the weeks leading up to the tragic massacre, the IDF made the perplexing decision to deactivate the towering observation balloons stationed along the Gaza border, crucial for monitoring the region's security. Despite looming warnings of an impending conflict, the IDF deferred maintenance on these critical surveillance assets, opting to resume regular operations.
Media investigations uncovered that the observation balloons, requiring mere one-day renovations, were inexplicably excluded from service upon receiving an order from the IDF. Strikingly, their deactivation coincided precisely with the terrorist attack by Hamas. The IDF had the capability to swiftly repair and restore these vital assets, yet deliberately postponed their maintenance until after the devastating events of Shabbat Simchat Torah, disregarding urgent warnings.
Eyewitness accounts further corroborate the negligence surrounding the observation balloons. Residents from communities such as Netiv Haa'Sara observed these balloons grounded on the eve of the attack, contrary to their usual 24-hour surveillance protocol. Despite heightened Hamas activity along the border, the IDF dismissed residents' concerns, insisting on the withdrawal of troops from the area, a decision met with incredulity and frustration among local communities.
System Failure - The Inoperable 'Omega' Intelligence System
Retired police superintendent Avi Weiss has exposed a shocking failure in the "Omega" intelligence system. This crucial system, designed to provide vital intelligence, was completely offline during the incident, leading to a severe lack of coordination between military units and commanders.
This breakdown created a dangerous disconnect from the reality on the ground, raising serious questions about the preparedness and response capabilities during the crisis.
Intelligence Inaction: The Shin Bet's Systemic Failures
Retired police superintendent Avi Weiss sheds light on the Shin Bet's intelligence shortcomings. Their sophisticated system designed to monitor Arab social networks failed during a critical period.
Despite an alert about Hamas' mobilization—indicated by the activation of thousands of Hamas SIM cards in Gaza at 1 a.m.—decisive action was delayed and ultimately dismissed the next day. This failure to respond, despite clear conflict indicators, highlights systemic intelligence deficiencies.
Neglected Vigilance: The Abandonment of 'Alertness at Dawn'
Reserve Major Yitzhak Barik sheds light on a standard procedure within the IDF known as "Konenut Im Shahar," or "Alertness at Dawn." This essential protocol involves thorough inspections of all military positions at daybreak, including comprehensive checks along the border fence and exercises to maintain readiness. However, Major Barik reveals that this critical procedure was inexplicably neglected on the day of the massacre, leaving military positions unchecked and compromising security along the border.
Breached Defences: The Neglected Security of the Gaza Border Fence
The Gaza border fence stands as one of the world's most sophisticated barriers, boasting years of investment in cutting-edge technology and protective measures. However, the IDF's neglect of routine maintenance and disregard for severe warnings compromised its integrity.
Initially heralded as impenetrable, the fence was showcased as a formidable deterrent against unauthorized entry. Specialized military units were deployed along its length to ensure constant vigilance, with even minor disturbances triggering swift responses. Yet, in the lead-up to the October 7th incident, a stark departure from protocol occurred.
Eyewitness accounts from numerous commanders and soldiers stationed along the Gaza border reveal a startling lapse in maintenance and security measures. Previously, any disturbance near the fence warranted immediate attention, but in the days preceding the attack, Hamas operatives were allowed to approach under the guise of "agricultural work." Despite reports of suspicious activity and mapping efforts by Hamas, commanders failed to act.
The events of that fateful Saturday morning defy comprehension. Thousands of terrorists breached the fence with explosives, visible from afar, while surveillance cameras captured the incursion. Astonishingly, no reinforcements were summoned to the scene, and assistance was delayed for hours, leaving the entire sector vulnerable.
Questions linger regarding the orders to abandon the fence and permit Hamas to conduct brazen breach training unhindered. The breach of the Gaza border fence stands as a glaring failure of security protocol, demanding accountability for those responsible.
Fatal Misjudgment: The IDF's Weapons Ban for Standby Forces
The IDF recently issued a controversial command forbidding the standby forces in the communities surrounding Gaza from keeping weapons in their homes. This decision has taken a bloody toll on the community.
The IDF's directive mandated that all weapons be stored in central armories, citing concerns about potential thefts from homes. This directive included confiscating long guns from some residents. Such a measure contradicts the fundamental principle of maintaining readiness, where soldiers are expected to be prepared for immediate action, often sleeping fully dressed with weapons at hand.
Despite urgent warnings before the disaster, the IDF did not revise this command. Consequently, many residents were massacred by Hamas terrorists while attempting to reach the armory to retrieve their weapons. In numerous instances, the armory was locked, keys were missing, and residents were unable to arm themselves in time.
A chilling example of the dire consequences of this decision comes from Avihai Brodetz of Kfar Aza. When terrorists attacked, Brodetz ran to the armory to retrieve his rifle. Upon his return, he found his house empty—his wife and three children had been kidnapped to Gaza.
This tragic policy failure starkly illustrates the need for a reassessment of security protocols to ensure the safety of residents in vulnerable areas.
Denied Surveillance: An Expert's License Revoked
Approximately three months before the massacre, Rafael Hayon, one of Israel's foremost experts in phone and internet surveillance, was inexplicably stripped of his license to monitor Hamas communications.
Rafael Hayon, a specialist in hacking phone lines and the internet, had voluntarily used professional equipment for years to listen to enemy communications. He had even received a special license from Israeli security authorities. Rafael maintained constant contact with senior officials in the Israeli army and security establishment, successfully thwarting numerous attacks over the years.
However, just a short time before the massacre, those same officials abruptly decided to revoke his surveillance capabilities. They confiscated his specialized equipment and license, preventing him from monitoring Hamas's phone calls and internet activities. This decision came despite escalating warnings about imminent threats.
Desperate, Rafael appealed to his contacts within the army, pleading to continue his critical work during such dangerous times. His requests were denied, with the explanation that "Your request was blocked from above," indicating a decision made at the highest levels. Officially, the army told him, "We already know everything. You are completely unnecessary and only a bother."
Rafael strongly believes that if he had been allowed to continue his surveillance, the catastrophic events could have been averted. He argues that with his capabilities, Hamas's plans could have been uncovered and neutralized, potentially preventing the disaster.
Security Leadership's Vacation Amid Dire Warnings
Despite all the dire warnings, Israel's security leadership chose to neglect their duties and go on holiday in Eilat on Friday (October 6, 2023).
Retired police superintendent Avi Weiss revealed that on that fateful holiday eve, almost the entire top echelon of the intelligence community, the Shin Bet, and the IDF were on a planned vacation in Eilat. Despite the escalating warnings, they decided to go on vacation, abandoning all the citizens near the Gaza border, including women and babies. They left the army without any emergency alerts, leading to the massacre and capture of observers who had raised alarms.
This highlights the negligence of the army and state leadership. The absence of the commanders and their trip to Eilat on the day of the disaster were likely premeditated. Their absence caused a complete breakdown of the military system, paralyzing it during the most critical hours. This included shutting down the Air Force and special divisions meant to operate during terrorist intrusions.
Battalions Paralyzed During Terrorist Infiltration Due to Missing Keys and Records
A battalion trained specifically for terrorist infiltration scenarios was rendered inoperative for 12 hours because they couldn't find the keys to the armory. Another battalion remained grounded, claiming they were missing necessary records to receive their weapons.
Special regiments, trained to be first responders to terrorist infiltrations in the communities surrounding Gaza, were ready to act on Saturday at 11 am at Katziot Base. However, they did nothing for 12 hours because the keys to the armory were missing. Meanwhile, another battalion couldn't arm itself because the records of the weapons' recipients were missing. The general manager was aware of this issue but took no action to resolve it.
During these critical hours of inaction, dozens of people lost their lives. Is this a coincidence, or does it suggest that someone ensured the success of the planned massacre?
Delays in Arming Reserve Fighters on October 7
Sergeant Gal Schwartz, a fighter in a reserve battalion belonging to the Southern Brigade, reported that on October 7, he and many other soldiers arrived at assembly areas in the south, ready to join the fight. However, they were left at the base without weapons and did not go out to battle.
Schwartz recounted, "We trained precisely for this scenario—a raid by 200 Hamas terrorists on the Storm outpost. We were trained to fight against Hamas, we knew the threat, and we were ready to engage."
He continued, "We arrived at the reserve around noon, just minutes away from the settlements under attack, where people were being murdered, but we were left in Tsalim without action until Monday. By noon, 80% of our battalion was already there, waiting for orders. Despite being so close to the conflict, we were not given weapons. There was an armory, but we did not receive weapons until midnight."
Schwartz emphasized, "If our battalion had been deployed at 1:00 p.m., we could have changed the situation. Four hundred fighters could have made a significant difference. I believe the problem lies with the chain of command."
Profiting from Peril: Investor Knowledge of Hamas Attacks
Recent reports in prominent global financial publications, including De-Marker in Israel and N12 News, shed light on a startling revelation: prior to the Hamas attack, many investors were privy to preliminary information about the impending breach and capitalized on this knowledge, reaping substantial profits.
Interestingly, the chosen date of the attack, October 7, was widely known among investors well in advance. This pattern of anticipation echoes a previous instance during the week of Passover, where a similar scheme was thwarted by heightened IDF vigilance. Notably, a recent study conducted by researchers from New York and Columbia Universities found a surge in short-selling activity against Israeli companies in the days leading up to the attack, including significant transactions involving Bank Leumi, resulting in profits amounting to millions of shekels.
The study's findings suggest that investors had access to advance information regarding the attack, leveraging this knowledge for financial gain. This raises pertinent questions about the discrepancy between the awareness of traders and the apparent lack of intelligence among the heads of the Shin Bet and the state regarding the October 7th date.
Unveiled Intentions: Hamas' Brazen Display of Aggression
Hamas openly broadcasted their intentions through Gaza media channels, showcasing videos depicting their training for the occupation of settlements, mass murder, and abduction of prisoners.
Zvi Yehezkali, chief reporter for Arab affairs at Channel 13, presented these alarming videos in the news studio, revealing Hamas' strategic preparations for invasion. The footage depicts Hamas operatives undergoing training in urban environments, simulating incursions into Israeli homes with chilling precision, executing acts of violence and abduction.
These videos, disseminated by Hamas in the Arab media, emerged a month prior to the tragic massacre. In his incredulity, Zvi Yehezkali posed a poignant question: "Here are the videos, here is Hamas, but where are we?" This prompts a crucial inquiry: does this not underscore a premeditated collaboration between Israel and Hamas? Such blatant evidence begs the question: would any normative country in the world ignore such stark realities without taking decisive action?
Forewarned: Hamas' Public Declaration of Aggression
In the days leading up to the terrorist attack, Hamas utilized Arab television to broadcast an interview featuring a spokesperson boldly announcing their imminent plans to occupy settlements and abduct captives.
Retired police superintendent Avi Weiss recounted the widely circulated video that surfaced on Arab television just days before the massacre, garnering global attention. In the interview, the Hamas spokesperson passionately declares, "This week you will see us occupying the communities! Taking prisoners!" The spokesperson brazenly outlines Hamas' intentions to launch full-scale missile attacks on Tel Aviv and Israel, while emphasizing the capture of Jewish communities and residents as just the initial step in their aggressive agenda.
Despite these explicit declarations made in the studio, Israeli intelligence, renowned as among the best globally, contends ignorance of this "secret" Hamas plan, despite receiving warnings from various sources.
Foreshadowing Tragedy: Hamas' Haunting Portrayal of the October 7 Massacre
During Ramadan approximately a year before the attack (2022), Hamas aired a chilling drama series that eerily foretold the events of the October 7 massacre with alarming accuracy.
Entitled "The Fist of the Free," the fictional series, produced by Hamas and broadcasted on their official TV channel, meticulously depicted Hamas' strategic planning and execution of a raid into Israeli territory from the Gaza Strip. The striking resemblance between the series' portrayal and the actual events of October 7 is uncanny.
Notably, the series received acclaim within Hamas circles, with particular praise coming from Yahya Sinwar, the leader of Hamas in the Gaza Strip. Sinwar even presented awards to the creators of the series, as seen in a recent video circulating on social media. In the video, Sinwar explicitly acknowledges that the events depicted in the series mirror Hamas' real-world preparations and intentions. He asserts that the series served as a blueprint for the meticulous planning and execution of Hamas' operations, emphasizing its integral role in their strategy for "release and return.”
Silent Warning: The Ignored Hamas Training Manual
Hamas distributed a comprehensive training manual for the impending attack, which fell into the hands of the IDF a week prior to the massacre. Shockingly, the army chose to disregard its contents.
Reports from Israeli media reveal that the IDF possessed a detailed Hamas booklet outlining every facet of the planned assault. This manual meticulously outlined strategies for occupying military bases and outposts in the Gaza Division, infiltrating nearby kibbutzim and moshavim, as well as the abduction and murder of civilians. Despite the explicit instructions contained within, the IDF opted to maintain silence and took no preparatory measures.
Hamas invested considerable time and resources in printing these instructional booklets, disseminating them among thousands of terrorists in Gaza. The booklet served as a sinister blueprint for the atrocities committed on that fateful Saturday, outlining the exact procedures for the assault on the Gaza Division and surrounding settlements.
The revelation that the IDF had possession of this damning evidence a full week before the attack has left the nation in disbelief. The decision by military leadership and the head of the Shin Bet to overlook this critical intelligence and refrain from action has raised profound concerns and questions about their judgment and commitment to safeguarding Israeli lives.
Unheeded Alerts: The Gaza Division's Forewarning of Hamas Invasion
News Channel 11 recently disclosed that a year before the tragic massacre, the Gaza Division received a comprehensive briefing from the Southern Command's intelligence titled "The Wall of Jericho - Plan for Seizing Settlements and Bases in the South."
This briefing, consisting of approximately forty slides, meticulously outlined Hamas's impending invasion strategy. It detailed infiltrations through 65 breaches in the fence, the use of motorcycles and cars to introduce terrorists, attacks on surveillance cameras, drone usage, and the targeting of towns like Ofakim and Sderot.
The entire briefing was transmitted to Major General Haliva, the head of AMAN (intelligence), and the Southern Command's commander in May 2022. Even as new intelligence updates were incorporated a month before the planned attack, no action was taken. Instead of heightening alert levels, state leaders chose inaction, effectively putting the military on standby.
The night before the invasion, some leaders received phone calls alerting them to the impending threat, but even then, crucial decision-makers like the Head of AMAN failed to take decisive action, choosing to remain passive. Despite glaring warning signs and detailed presentations, military leadership obstinately refused to act, turning a blind eye to the looming danger.
The intelligence community's failure to act, despite its reputation as "the best in the world," raises significant questions. Contrastingly, recent successes like the Mossad's thwarting of a Hezbollah attack in Brazil highlight the stark disparity in addressing threats. The irony of knowing about and thwarting a distant attack while failing to detect and prevent a massive invasion in their own backyard underscores the gravity of the intelligence failure.
In the aftermath of the tragedy on October 7th, the claim that everyone was caught off guard rings hollow as soldiers fell victim to the attack, underscoring the devastating consequences of negligence in the face of clear warnings.
Media Presence: The Contrasting Awareness of Hamas' Attack
Several global media networks dispatched reporters to the scene alongside Hamas terrorists, capturing real-time footage of the breach and abduction of Israeli citizens. Meanwhile, the Shin Bet and Israel's acclaimed intelligence remained oblivious to the impending attack.
The baffling disparity becomes glaringly apparent when considering that journalists took calculated risks to document the event, confident in the absence of imminent IDF intervention. This raises crucial questions: how did international media anticipate the attack and arrive equipped with advanced cameras, while Israeli intelligence, purportedly "the best in the world," remained unaware? This stark discrepancy underscores serious concerns regarding the efficacy of the IDF and the Shin Bet.
Security Breach: IDF's Neglect of Hamas Threats at the Border
The IDF disregarded concerning Hamas activities near the border fence, allowing them to dismantle security cameras without any response.
Former police commissioner Avi Weiss revealed during a broadcast that Hamas had incorporated the removal of the separation fence cameras into their pre-attack preparations. This negligence is unacceptable; permitting Hamas to tamper with the fence while actively training to breach Israel's border is a grave oversight.
Furthermore, despite Hamas's actions being captured on IDF cameras, neither the Shin Bet, intelligence agencies, nor the IDF intervened, enabling the attack on the security cameras to proceed unchecked.
Neglected Alerts: IDF's Failure to Respond to Hamas Incursions
On the night of the attack, the IDF disregarded two highly significant warnings regarding the imminent approach of thousands of Hamas terrorists toward the fence.
Reserve Major Yitzhak Barik revealed that the IDF received two alerts that night, signalling the advance of thousands of Hamas militants converging on the fence from multiple points simultaneously. This critical information, widely reported in the media, reached the highest echelons of government and the military. However, instead of escalating consultations, authorities chose to dismiss the warnings, neglecting to inform or caution a single resident in the Gaza envelope or to place adjacent sectors and military bases on urgent emergency alert.
The egregious disregard for these alerts begs the question: could such inaction be attributed to anything other than a deliberate desire for the event to culminate in disaster and tragedy?
Increasing Warnings Ignored
Warnings about Hamas approaching the fence increased daily. Every day, there was more recorded activity by Hamas. Countless soldiers who served on the Gaza border recently unanimously testified to this increased activity, yet the IDF did not raise its alert level. In an interview on Channel 11, a female observer who was serving there on the day of the massacre shared: “They (Hamas) had training sessions once a week. Then suddenly, it was once a day. Then twice a day. Eventually, it was all the time. Shouldn't that raise alertness?”
The soldiers and female observers do not believe in a conspiracy involving senior ranks collaborating with Hamas. However, they fail to understand how the IDF became the Defence Forces of Hamas. The day before the attack, Hamas operatives were seen with maps, discussing a breach in front of the fence, yet the commanders dismissed these concerns.
Overlooked Warnings from Observation Balloon Operators (Warned, Provided Proof & Paid With Their Life)
An article on Channel 11 highlights the story of five combat soldiers operating observation balloons at the Nahal Oz outpost. These soldiers repeatedly warned about Hamas training with drones. Some even took photos and videos of the terrorists paragliding and training with drones right on the Israeli border.
These soldiers, who reported and filmed Hamas’s training activities, were tragically murdered by the same terrorists they had been warning about. In remembrance of one of the murdered soldiers, his friends recounted how he alerted, photographed, and sent reports to state leaders.
Unfortunately, IDF leaders dismissed, mocked, and silenced these warnings. Instead of heeding the alerts, they took down observation balloons before the Hamas attack.
Observers' Warnings Ignored: The Lead-Up to Disaster
Numerous articles have emerged since the October 7th massacre, featuring interviews with female observers who served in the Gaza Envelope and survived. These observers consistently reported increased Hamas activity and live fire training. They recognized the mounting threat and warned their superiors that these exercises could soon become a real-life danger.
Despite their repeated alerts, it was unclear how seriously their warnings were taken. The media's claims that the observers did not witness the preparations have been proven false. These observers did their duty, some are still held hostage by Hamas, many paid with their lives. Some speculate that efforts to eliminate these observers were attempts to obscure evidence, should a trial be held for the atrocities committed.
Observers were threatened with prosecution if they continued to report their findings (prior to the attack). Despite witnessing changes and increased activity near the border, their concerns were dismissed. When they reported these anomalies to a senior commander, they were told to stop discussing it or face trial.
Disturbingly, five female observers taken by helicopter disappeared without a trace. One observer's father, in his quest for answers, revealed that all cameras had been confiscated. Later, it was discovered that most of these observers were murdered, but questions remain about who was responsible if not Hamas.
Had no weapons too!
Full article: https://www.mako.co.il/news-military/2024_q2/Article-1cb4a391c8f2291026.htm
Hamas Training Warnings Ignored by Military Leadership
A senior operative in the 8200 unit of Israeli intelligence, Modi'in, reported extensively on Hamas training exercises, explicitly warning of a potential invasion and massacre. Despite these detailed warnings, the army dismissed the scenario as "imaginary."
The operative described an intense training session in late May, involving two Nakba companies. The exercise spanned from morning until 8:30 PM, featuring terrorists mounted on jeeps and motorcycles. They rehearsed shooting down fighter planes and helicopters, taking over a kibbutz, and seizing a military base with orders to kill all personnel.
In her email, the operative urged, “please do not ignore this!” Her concerns were corroborated by her colleagues in Modi'in. Within days, another soldier reported additional Hamas training involving other battalions. This was followed by intercepted communications indicating readiness for an imminent attack. However, on July 12, a commanding officer dismissed these reports, calling the scenario "totally imaginary."
Despite this, the soldier persisted, denying the imaginary nature of the threat and emphasizing Hamas's capabilities. She warned, "If you don't address this now, we may not be able to give you a warning in real time." She highlighted the imminent danger, referencing quotes from Hamas leaders advocating for violence against Jews.
The negligence in addressing these warnings showcases a severe oversight in military intelligence, underscoring the catastrophic consequences of underestimating credible threats.
Heads of Communities Warnings Ignored
The leaders of the communities were alerted to imminent threats and warnings from Hamas regarding potential violence. Despite these serious alerts, the military advised them to refrain from public comment, downplaying the gravity of the situation.
Prior to the tragic events, settlement leaders had received notifications via their mobile devices warning of planned attacks by Hamas. Immediately recognizing the urgency of the situation, they appealed to the military for reinforcements and additional weaponry to fortify their defences. Regrettably, their concerns were met with derision and dismissal by military officials.
Furthermore, despite the looming danger, the military assured that public gatherings, including a large-scale event in Reim with thousands of participants, could proceed as scheduled. They even suggested that holding such gatherings near the fence, as opposed to Yehoshua Gardens in Tel Aviv, would be safer, despite the imminent threat.
Expert Ignored
The warnings of expert Rafael Hayon, who diligently alerted authorities since 2019 about Hamas' intentions to seize control of the communities in the Gaza Envelope, committing atrocities against residents and taking hostages, were tragically overlooked by both the Shin Bet and intelligence agencies.
Rafael Hayon asserts that he possesses numerous recordings featuring Hamas members openly discussing their nefarious plans. According to him, there was no secrecy; they openly detailed their intentions to execute a comprehensive assault on the settlements and to detain civilians. According to reports, the warnings were given by Rafael since 2019! Despite this wealth of information being relayed to government and military leadership, the intelligence heads chose to suppress the matter and took no action. One month before October the 7th, his Lisence was revoked.
In emotional interviews, Rafael Chayon breaks down in tears, mourning the loss of around forty close friends who served in Gaza divisions and perished due to the IDF's disregard of his warnings. He emphasizes that had his meticulously detailed alerts been heeded, the abductions and subsequent massacre could have been prevented entirely.
Unheeded Warnings: The Urgent Call to Action by Major General Yigal Carmon
Major General Yigal Carmon, a respected figure in counter-terrorism and the chairman of the Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI), issued grave warnings to all sectors of the country, but they were regrettably disregarded.
General Carmon, renowned globally for his expertise in combating terrorism, forewarned of an impending conflict at the hands of Hamas two months prior to the devastating massacre. His urgent alerts were disseminated through MEMRI's platforms, which meticulously collect and analyze information from public sources, including programs and terrorist organizations.
Despite personally reaching out to numerous journalists and senior security officials in Israel, his warnings were overlooked and no action was taken.
Yigal Carmon, the founder and president of MEMRI, brings a wealth of experience as a Major General in the reserves and as a former counter-terrorism advisor to three Israeli Prime Ministers. His roles have encompassed leading civilian administration in practice in regions such as Judea, Samaria, and the Gaza Strip.
Overlooked Alerts: The Disregarded Egyptian Warning on Gaza's Impending Threat
The Israeli intelligence overlooked crucial warnings conveyed by their Egyptian counterparts, who cautioned of an imminent and catastrophic event emerging from Gaza.
Dr. Nimrod Novick, an Israeli entrepreneur with close ties to the Egyptian government, disclosed that he had engaged in discussions with a high-ranking officer from Egyptian intelligence in the weeks preceding the tragedy. The Egyptian intelligence officer had conveyed a dire message to their Israeli counterparts, emphasizing the severity of the impending threat with the stark declaration: "Something big and terrible is coming from Gaza."
The Media: The Watchdog of Institutional Dictatorship
Not a day has passed since the horrific massacre in the Gaza Envelope, and the media is already warning the public (as they did during the COVID era) about the dangers of fake news. They claim you are not strong enough to digest the blatant betrayal captured in thousands of real-time videos filmed by Hamas, the murdered, and the survivors from the Gaza Envelope. These videos, shared by TV reporters, were authentic records of the massacre scenes. Yet, suddenly, the state urges us to stop and not trust what we see directly from the field—the neglect, abandonment of civilians, and collaboration of traitorous Israelis with Hamas. Instead, they want us to view everything through their controlled filter.
In essence, they want us to see only what doesn’t expose their failings. They aim to keep us under their control by censoring and blacking out all other information, much like the secretive agreement with Pfizer. Anyone caught distributing truthful videos that incriminate the state will be arrested and face a three-year prison sentence. This is dictatorship at its finest—a totalitarian control process. The issue of media censorship, as part of the state’s betrayal of its residents, must be addressed and understood by the public.
For years, the media has not protected the people or aided the weak. Instead, it has become a tool of war, a mind-engineering device that performs the establishment’s brainwashing. The media, which claims to be the watchdog of democracy, is supposed to protect citizens from monopolistic corporations and expose government corruption. It should be challenging politicians to ensure they act in the citizens’ best interests. However, as seen during COVID, the establishment media channels, including newspapers, radio, and internet news, avoided any discussion, question, or hint of internal betrayal.
In conclusion, the media has revealed itself as the government's watchdog, spreading fake news and casting lies upon a truth-seeking public while boldly labeling real facts as 'fake news.' As the saying goes, “Everyone who disqualifies, in their own way, they themselves are disqualified.”
A Severe Warning Against Truth Revealers
Two days after the horrific massacre, Channel 13 published an article warning anyone who dares to question the integrity of Israel's security decision-makers and authorities. The article stated, "Posts shamelessly accuse the IDF and Shin Bet of collaborating with Hamas's attack. Israelis are claiming that members of the security forces helped Hamas!" Alon Ben David went further, asserting that raising concerns about potential traitors among us equates to betrayal and collaboration with the enemy. According to him, truth-tellers are traitors.
The past 70 years have shown how the state and government have betrayed the public, from the Yemenite children affair to the thousands who died from COVID vaccines. The massacre on October 7 brought a realization similar to the boy who declared, "The emperor has no clothes." Newspapers are filled with pages about 'failures,' yet they spare those funding them, avoiding blame on the truly responsible.
Silencing the Truth
During a Channel 14 broadcast hosted by Arel Segal, Shai Goldstein suggested that there might have been cooperation on the day of the massacre. Goldstein said, "The public knows and connects the dots from various events... and suspects." Segal quickly interjected, "You and I don't suspect," to which Goldstein, understanding the hint, replied, "Of course we don't suspect."
Despite being silenced, Goldstein persisted, saying, "In this matter of coincidences...," only to be cut off again. This exchange highlighted the government's absolute control over the media, blocking any inspection or suggestion of an inside job, labeling such suggestions as betrayals.
Denying Conspiracy
In a press conference, a journalist asked Prime Minister Netanyahu about a survey indicating that 32% of the public believes insiders were involved or had prior knowledge of the Hamas attacks. Netanyahu responded, "There is no conspiracy. There was no conspiracy. And there cannot be... There are questions that need to be answered, such as what happened and how it happened, but this will be discussed after the war, certainly not now." His diplomatic answer avoided excuses, while the media continues to block anyone presenting facts that could prove the extent of the state and army's betrayal.
Publications Of Crucial Moments During The Attack Were Muzzled
An order was issued from the political level to all media to delay the publication of the Hamas attack and the breach of the fence for about two hours, preventing the potential saving of hundreds of lives.
A senior broadcaster in Channel 14's news studio revealed shocking details about the IDF's instructions to the media. He stated: "The first video of a squad infiltrating Sderot in vans was captured at 7:15 in the morning. We, the journalists, were instructed not to publish it. We were prevented from reporting anything for an hour and a half. During that time, if we had reported the event, we could have warned people to lock themselves in their houses, arm themselves, and save lives!"